Essay On Origins Of World War -- essays research papers

The thesis in the article The origins of the knowledge base War, by Sidney B. Fay, can clearly be stated as the explanation for World War I. Fay states that no one country is responsible for the mankind of the war. Furthermore, he goes on to explain that each of the European countrys leaders did, or failed to do certain things to provoke the other countries into a war. Fay states, unrivaled must abandon the dictum of the Versailles Treaty that Germany and her allies were solely responsible. It was a dictum exacted by victors from vanquished, under the influence of the blindness, ignorance, hatred, and the propagandist misconceptions to which war had effrontery rise. (Fay, The Origins of the World War). His main arguments are his explanations of how each country was responsible for the creation of the war. His first explanation is that of how Serbia was partly responsible. Fay explains that Serbia knew that by non co-operating with the Austrian governance over the implications of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand assassination they were indirectly preparing for a war they would fight scarce did not want. Fay says that Austria was more responsible for the war than any other world power but not in military attack, but more in the form of self-defence. He makes it clear that Austria was justified in their battle and that they didnt have to, sit back and await the dismemberment at the transfer of its neighbors. (Fay, The origins of the World War). Fay believes that Berchtold wanted a local war with Serbia but knew and was heart with the fact that the rest of Europe could very easily become twisting with the war. Fays third countrys explanation was that of Germany. He believed that Germany did not want a war and tried to avert one completely. It is his stamp that since Austria was Germanys only dependable ally, they were dragged into the war. Furthermore, he explains that Germanys geographical location, being in the middle of the conflict between France and Russia, they had little choice in the matter and had to defend their territory as well as Austria-Hungarys. Fays fourth country and major power discussed, was Russia. He believed that Russia supported Serbia because of the patronize guidance and encouragement given at Belgrade, and if a war were to shock out they would more than happy to fight along with the belief of France and Britain parcel out. Furthermore, at the same ... ...to win this continental war, if it was to come to that. They also in turn had the belief that France may panic, and advise peace. This would have been a diplomatic win in the Germans books. This would have divorce Russia from France and isolate both without war. Although this second point was believed to be unconvincing by the Germans it still was a happy, and reassuring possibility. Fischer then went on to say that Hollweg told Bulow that any war that was to occur would last at the most three to four months. Hollweg then went on to explain the poss ibilities of a friendly relationship with England, and then through England, a similar companionship with France. He then stated that this would bring forth a trey alliance with England, France, and Germany all extinguishing the existence of Russia, which would easily threaten the subtlety of Europe. Fischer then concludes his essay in Hollwegs address to the Central delegation of the Reichstag at the beginning of October during the ever increasing debate on the unconditioned submarine warfare. Fischer states that, this outlines Germanys real guilt, her constant over-estimation of her own powers, and her misjudgment of realities.